\"Writing.Com
*Magnify*
Printed from https://ridinghhood.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers
The Writing.Com members below are accepting review requests and ready to review your item! Peruse the list, check out members' review styles and request a review from anyone who seems like a good fit for your item.
Preferred Author
♫~ Kenword~♫ Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I try my best to read everything on Writing.com with great care. My reviews always include a first impression, my feelings about theme and structure and where appropriate, some thoughts about possible revisions.*Mugr*
Preferred Author
Mousethyme Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Casual. More my opinion than, say, most reviewers.
Preferred Author
HollyMerry Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Honest and encouraging
Preferred Author
Smee Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to go in depth on how I felt whilst reading it. I'll point out where I was tripped out of my flow by sentence structure or oddity. What confuses me. What intrigues me. Examples can be seen in my recent reviews. Happy to review privately on request. Default will be public.
 
I use "Comment-In-A-BoxOpen in new Window. for my ratings.
dalericky's Portfolio
Registered Author
Dale Author Icon
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
I'm a casual reader. Did I enjoy the reading experience? Would I read more? I will highlight what I did and/or didn't enjoy. I do not edit grammar or spelling, but I might comment on it.
Registered Author
Escape Artist Author Icon
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
My opinion will rely heavily on content, character and story arc, and reflect anything that catches my eye...purely from a readers standpoint.
Preferred Author
Liam Author Icon
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
I like to emphasize the positive attributes of your work, but I will offer suggestions for improvement if I'm able.
Registered Author
Quenntis Ashby Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am a slushpile reader for a Science Fiction and Fantasy magazine. I have a lot of review and critique experience, and love to celebrate what works in a story. If I feel confused or unsure about parts of a story I am usually able to explain why I think it didn't quite work. If I am able to think of some ideas to explore which might help to improve or clarify things for the reader, I share them in a way that I feel is productive and helpful.
dnadream's Portfolio
Preferred Author
SilverMoon Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I look at the title, premise, overall structure first. Then I see how it makes me feel. After that, I might comment on little errors which are easily fixed.
dragonline's Portfolio
Preferred Author
dragonline (dragon online) Author Icon
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
I've spent hours upon hours upon hours editing my own work and others. I tend to review in that same mode with the goal of offering suggestions and possible improvements. I give positives/negatives and details.
Preferred Author
Beholden Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have a review template that is only used for in depth reviews, usually those that are specifically requested. These will be as comprehensive as I can manage, including everything I have noticed in reading the piece. Most of my reviews, however, are more in the nature of reactions to the piece with brief notes on things I find particularly good and suggestions on dealing with any obvious flaws in the writing.
Preferred Author
Jellyfish - HAPPY 25th WDC!! Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to always pick out the positive points in a piece, even if overall I am not enamoured by it. I tend to point out grammatical and spelling errors. I will be honest, but not unkind *Smile*
leslieloo1's Portfolio
Registered Author
Leslie Loo Author Icon
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
I don't know what my style is, but I point out what sticks out at me.
Preferred Author
Amethyst Angel Humble & Kind Author Icon
(minimum 2,000 GPs)
Casual, friendly. I'll point out typos when I see them and make suggestions about quality, characters and logic, besides telling you how I feel about the piece.
kingalex1234's Portfolio
Registered Author
kingalex1234 Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I tend to be constructive, though I've been known to be a bit too nice...at least, in my opinion. note that while I'll review anything requested, they can be a bit sloppy if I don't take interest.
joewong's Portfolio
Registered Author
JW Fiction Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'll give you my honest opinion and find something positive for you to build on. I'll try to be as thorough as possible in my review.
sodette's Portfolio
Registered Author
Shawn Odette Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I give constructive criticism of your work. I will be very honest but polite. When I read a story I ask myself if this is something I would pay to read in a magazine or an online venue. If it is, I will tell you why, if not I will tell you why it's not. Please do not send me rough drafts. If it is not a finished copy, then I don't want to see it because the errors tend to be too distracting from the actual story.
jankedyman's Portfolio
Registered Author
Ethan Wolverton Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'll read your writing, and dissect it line-for-line adjusting any grammar, flow, spelling, etc. I will also give my general opinion of your piece. I will never insult you and will point out the good and the bad. I am very nit picky so if you don't like that then I suggest you move on. However, I believe I am capable of improving your writing technique, quality and overall style.
Preferred Author
GERVIC Author Icon
(minimum 5,000 GPs)
My reviewing style varies. I may do a little edit if possible or pinpoint what I think is incorrect. My review is merely base on what I feel about your piece. If I enjoy it, I say it. If not, I tell you why I'm not. I often do reviews on all Poetry Items- regardless of the genres, styles and the way it was written. However if you like, you can request a short story, chapter not the entire book or novel, articles and essays, etc. 2023 Quill Nominee
scarlettsaysso's Portfolio
Registered Author
Samantha Author Icon
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
My review style is simple- I like to keep it short and sweet. I tend to use something I learned in college, which is called the "sandwich technique". I will tell you something positive, then include any constructive comments that I feel may be of use to you, then end with another positive.
Printed from https://ridinghhood.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers